【跨界與流動系列講座 Special Lecture Series on Trans-boundary Crossing and Circulation】
Topic 1: China-Myanmar Relations after the 1 February Military Coup
Speaker 1: Dr. Kristína Kironská (柯蓉卡)
(Advocacy Director, the Central European Institute of Asian Studies, Bratislava, Slovakia; Senior Researcher, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic)
Topic 2: Kremlin as the Patron of the Tatmadaw: Russia-Myanmar Relations in the Post-Coup Era
Speaker 2: Dr. Michał Lubina (魯米浩)
(Associate Professor, the Institute of Middle and Far Eastern Studies, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland; 2022 Taiwan Fellowship Scholar)
Interlocutor: Dr. Tsai-Wei Sun (孫采薇)
(Associate Professor, Graduate Institute of East Asian Studies, National Chengchi University)
Chair: Dr. Wen-Chin Chang (張雯勤)
(Research Fellow, Center for Asia-Pacific Area Studies (CAPAS) of RCHSS, Academia Sinica)
- Time: 13:00~, Tuesday, November 8, 2022【12:45-13:00 Registration】
- Venue: R2319, Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica (meeting room limits up to 20 attendees, simultaneous video conferencing via WebEx will be available)
- Online Registration: https://forms.gle/air8mpTbyqFpkYTK8
- Registration Deadline: 17:00, Monday, October 31, 2022
- Organizer: Center for Asia-Pacific Area Studies (CAPAS), RCHSS, Academia Sinica
【演講1摘要 About the Lecture 1】
Following Myanmar’s 1 February military coup, Beijing has remained more cautious than other countries in its response. Protesters accused China of supporting the Myanmar generals, torching Chinese factories, and boycotting Chinese products in response. Was China, however, actually, backing the Tatmadaw (Myanmar military)? It would be too simplistic to assume that China favors a return to military rule in Myanmar. Myanmar, with its many Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) projects, is important for China to achieve its strategic presence in the Indian Ocean and choosing the appropriate strategy is therefore crucial for a continued relationship. Beijing’s initial ambiguous attitude towards the coup did not favor the Tatmadaw, and despite a reasonable relationship with Aung San Suu Kyi did not favor the protest movement either. As time passed, however, China edged increasingly closer to recognizing the military regime, approving funds for infrastructure projects, and donating COVID-19 vaccines. Why did such a shift occur? Although initially logical and beneficial, appearing neutral would become more costly to China’s strategic interests as time goes on.
【講者1簡介 About the Speaker 1】
Kristína Kironská is a socially engaged interdisciplinary academic with experience in Myanmar affairs, Taiwan affairs, Central and Eastern Europe-China relations, campaigns, and activism. In 2015-2016, she lived in Myanmar, where she worked for a local non-governmental organization and conducted research on the 2015 elections, the political transition of the country, and the issue of the Rohingya. In 2017-2018, she worked for Amnesty International as a campaigner (currently the Board Director). In 2019-2020, she lived in Taipei where she conducted research under the Taiwan Fellowship program, lectured at the University of Taipei, and organized monthly human rights talks. Currently, she is the Advocacy Director at the Central European Institute of Asian Studies (www.ceias.eu) and a Senior Researcher at the Palacky University in Olomouc. She can be reached at email@example.com.
【演講2摘要About the Lecture 2】
Until Myanmar’s 1st February 2021 military coup Russia-Myanmar relations remained good yet limited. Both sides cooperated in arms sales, making it the backbone of their relationship, in military training and supported one another diplomatically; they also held talks in nuclear cooperation. The breakthrough came with the military coup, politically supported by Russia. Since then Moscow became Tatmadaw’s second most important global partner (after China) and Russia-Myanmar ties only intensified after Russia’s full scale invasion of Ukraine on 24th February 2022. Since then a new patron-client relationship is emerging: thanks to engaging with the Tatmadaw, Russia sells arms, secures a political beachhead in Southeast Asia and limits its own isolation; as for the Tatmadaw, it gets arms, partially decreases its global isolation and limits its reliance on China. In a way, it is a contemporary Burmese version of two-headed bird strategy employed in precolonial Southeast Asia. For both sides, it is a mutually convenient asymmetric relationship of two isolated countries.
【講者2簡介About the Speaker 2】
Michał Lubina is Associate Professor of Political Science at Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland. In his research he mostly focuses on contemporary Myanmar and on Russia-China relations. He is the author of nine books (three in English), including ‘A Political Biography of Aung San Suu Kyi’ (Routledge: London-New York 2020), ‘Russia and China. A Political Marriage of Convenience’ (Budrich: Leverkusen-Berlin-Toronto 2017) and ‘The Moral Democracy. The Political Thought of Aung San Suu Kyi’ (Scholar: Warsaw 2018; also translated into Burmese and published in Myanmar in 2020) as well as over 100 articles on Asian issues. In 2016-2017 he served as the first Director of Korean Sejong Institute in Krakow. In 2018 he was a Visiting Professor at Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok. Currently he is MoFA Taiwan Fellow 2022. He can be reach at: firstname.lastname@example.org.